ORCID
0000-0002-8944-549X
Keywords
comparative and international research, post/decolonial, Global South, researcher identity
Special Issue
JCIHE: Vol. 18(2) 2026
Abstract
The formation of researcher identity is complex and evolves over various experiences, including international fieldwork and research. Especially important to consider is how power dynamics impact the development of researcher identity in the cases of international research between the Global North and Global South. This study uses phenomenological and decolonial approaches to analyze 23 interviews of faculty from India and the United Kingdom who have worked on UK-India research projects in the field of social sciences. Salient themes on how power and being were constructed, challenged, or negotiated by the participants include how researchers locate themselves in the paradigm of Global North and Global South, how they navigate casteism, and how researchers resisted power hierarchies as part of their identity and practice. While some themes manifested similarly for both British and Indian faculty, others were more prevalent among a particular group. This paper contributes to understanding how faculty construct their researcher identities as global researchers. It provides a comparative perspective on how faculty understand power dynamics in international research partnerships in relation to their researcher identities.
Recommended Citation
Lumb, Punita
(2026)
"The Messy Negotiation of Power, Context, and Self in Constructing a Global Researcher Identity,"
Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education: Vol. 18:
No.
2, Article 10.
DOI: 10.64899/2151-0407.1809
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/jcihe/vol18/iss2/10
References
Abbott, D. (2006). Disrupting the ‘whiteness’ of fieldwork in geography. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 27, 326–341. http://doi:10.1111/j.1467-9493.2006.00265.x
Aksnes, D. W., Piro, F. N. & Rørstad, K. (2019). Gender gaps in international research collaboration: a bibliometric approach. Scientometrics, 120, 747–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03155-3
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203820551
Bhabha, H. K. (2022). Hospitality and psychiatry: Just a gut feeling. In L. Laubscher, D. Hook, & M.U. Desai (Ed.) Fanon, Phenomenology, and Psychology (pp. xvii-xx) [Foreword]. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003037132
Colman, A.V. (2022). Corporeal schemas and body images. In L. Laubscher, D. Hook, & M.U. Desai (Eds.) Fanon, Phenomenology, and Psychology (pp. 127–138). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003037132
Sefa Dei, G. J. (2009). Indigenous knowledge! Anyone? Pedagogical possibilities for anti-colonial education. In Teaching Africa: Towards a Transgressive Pedagogy (pp. 86–103). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5771-7_7
Dirth, T. P., & Adams, G. A. (2019). Decolonial theory and disability studies: On the modernity/coloniality of ability. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 7(1), 260–289. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v7i1.762
D'Souza, P., & Sukumar, N. (Eds.) (2023). The journey of Caste in India: Voices from margins (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003317173
Fanon, F. (2008). Black skin, white masks. Grove Press.
Ferreira da Silva, D. (2015). Before man: Sylvia Wynter’s rewriting of the modern episteme. In K. McKittrick (Ed.) Sylvia Wynter on Being Human as Praxis (pp. 90–105). Duke University Press.
Friedman, J. Z. (2018). Everyday nationalism and elite research universities in the USA and England. Higher Education, 76, 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0206-1
Gandhi, L. (2019). Postcolonial theory: A critical introduction (2nd ed). Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/gand17838
Giampapa, F. (2011). The politics of “being and becoming” a researcher: Identity, power, and negotiating the field. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 10(3), 132–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2011.585304
Giri, A. K. (2021). With and beyond epistemologies from the South: Ontological epistemology of participation, multi-topial hermeneutics and the calling of planetary realisations. Sociological Bulletin, 70(3), 366–383. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/00699667231152284
Giwa, A. (2015). Insider/outsider issues for development researchers from the Global South. Geography Compass, 9(6), pp. 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12219
Grosfoguel, R. (2006). World-systems analysis in the context of transmodernity, border thinking, and global coloniality. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 29(2), 167–187.
Grosfoguel, R. (2013). The structure of knowledge in Westernized universities. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge, 11(1), 73–90.
Hernandez, G. L. (2023). Anationality: Identifying with neither here nor there. Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education, 15(1), pp. 169–179. http://doi.org/10.32674/jcihe.v15i1.3923
Jangam, C. (2021, April 8). Decolonizing caste and rethinking social inequality in South Asia [Seminar presentation]. Center for the Advanced Study of India, University of Pennsylvania. https://casi.sas.upenn.edu/events/chinnaiahjangam
Klein, E. J., & Taylor, M. (2022). Our bodies tell the story: Using feminist research and friendship to reimagine education and our lives. Myers Education Press.
Kloß, S. T. (2017). The Global South as subversive practice: Challenges and potentials of a heuristic concept. Global South, 11(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2979/globalsouth.11.2.01
Kwiek, M. & Roszka, W. (2021), Gender disparities in international research collaboration: a study of 25,000 university professors. Journal of Economic Surveys, 35, 1344–1380. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12395
Lavis, V. (2010). Multiple researcher identities: Highlighting tensions and implications for ethical practice in qualitative interviewing. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 7(4), 316–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880902929506
Lugones, M. (2010). Towards a decolonial feminism. Hypatia, 25(4), 742–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01137.x
Maldonado-Torres, N. (2007). On the coloniality of being: Contributions to the development of a concept. Cultural Studies, 21(2-3), 240–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162548
Mertkan, S., & Bayraklı, H. (2018). Re-inventing researcher identity: when the individual interacts with the contextual power dynamics. Higher Education Research & Development, 37, 316–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1355891
Mignolo, W. (2023). The colonial matrix of power. In C. O. Christiansen, M. L. Machado-Guichon, S. Mercader, O. B. Hunt, P. Jha (Eds) Talking About Global Inequality (pp. 39–46). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08042-5_5
Miller, R. E. (2015). Mappila Muslim Culture: How a historic Muslim community in India has blended tradition and modernity. SUNY Press. https://doi-org/10.1515/9781438456027-012
Nandy, A. (2009). The intimate enemy: Loss and recovery of self under Colonialism (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Nandy, A. & Darby, P. (2018), Challenging the ruling paradigms of the global knowledge system: Ashis Nandy in conversation with Phillip Darby. Postcolonial Studies, 21(3), 278–284. http://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2018.1481730
Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology, 15(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005
Quijano, A., Mignolo, W., Segato, R. L. & Walsh, C. E. (2024). Aníbal Quijano: foundational essays on the coloniality of power. Duke University Press.
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
Shahjahan, R. A. (2005). Spirituality in the academy: reclaiming from the margins and evoking a transformative way of knowing the world. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18(6), 685–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390500298188
Soong, H., & Caldwell, D. (2021). Tensions, transformations and travel: Comparative narratives of ‘becoming’ a cosmopolitan educator through an overseas study tour in Singapore. Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education, 13(2), 132–144. https://doi.org/10.32674/jcihe.v13i2.2543
Stahl, N. A., & King, J. R. (2020). Expanding approaches for research: Understanding and using
trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Developmental Education, 44(1), 26–
28. https://doi.org/10.1353/jde.2020.0005
Subedi, B. (2006). Theorizing a ‘halfie’ researcher’s identity in transnational fieldwork. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(5), 573–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390600886353
Sukumar, N. (2022). Caste discrimination and exclusion in Indian universities: A critical reflection. Routledge.
Trefzer, A., Jackson, J. T., McKee, K., & Dellinger, K. (2014). The Global South and/in the Global North: Interdisciplinary investigations. The Global South, 8(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.2979/globalsouth.8.2.1
Wallerstein, I. M. (2004). World-systems analysis: An introduction. Duke University Press.
Ward, K. (2023), The body maledict: Understanding the method of standpoint phenomenology through the work of Frantz Fanon. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 61, 340–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjp.12484
Wynter, S. (2001). Towards the sociogenic principle: Fanon, identity, the puzzle of conscious experience, and what it is like to be "black". In M. F. Duran-Cogan & A. Gomez-Moriana (Eds). National identities and sociopolitical changes in Latin America (pp. 30–66). Routledge.
Wynter, S. (2003). Unsettling the coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom: Towards the human, after man, its overrepresentation--an argument. CR: The New Centennial Review, 3(3), 257–337. https://doi.org/10.1353/ncr.2004.0015

