ORCID
0009-0008-1502-0772
Keywords
global DEI, adaptive leadership, racial equity, international higher education, decolonization, global partnerships
Special Issue
JCIHE Summer 2026 Special Issue
Abstract
Abstract
As internationalization in higher education expands through transnational research, global curricula, humanitarian training programs, and faculty mobility, discourses on diversity often remain Western-centered and detached from lived realities of structural inequity. This paper argues that adaptive leadership, grounded in mobilizing communities to confront systemic challenges in complex and uncertain environments, provides a useful pathway for rebuilding global DEI with racial equity at the center (Heifetz et al., 2009). Drawing from practice-based insight in global health, humanitarian workforce systems, HBCU models of global engagement, and higher education HR structures, the paper interrogates how colonial legacies, racial hierarchies, anti-DEI political climates, and generational tensions shape inclusion within international academic partnerships. Through a qualitative synthesis of organizational documents, DEI models, and practitioner reflections, this essay introduces a three-part adaptive framework that includes diagnosing inequities rooted in colonial educational systems, mobilizing communities through storytelling and intergenerational dialogue, and institutionalizing racial equity through equity audits, shared authorship, and the recognition of non-Western intellectual traditions. The paper underscores the urgency of this work, particularly as anti-DEI policies in the United States influence international collaborations and raise questions about the values that guide academic partnerships. The goal is to move beyond symbolic inclusion and support institutions in reimagining global DEI through justice-based, reciprocal, and equity-centered practices.
Abstract - Translated
Resumen
A medida que la internacionalización en la educación superior se expande a través de la investigación transnacional, los planes de estudio globales, los programas de formación humanitaria y la movilidad del profesorado, los discursos sobre diversidad a menudo permanecen centrados en marcos occidentales y desvinculados de las realidades vividas de la inequidad estructural. Este artículo sostiene que el liderazgo adaptativo, basado en la movilización de comunidades para enfrentar desafíos sistémicos en entornos complejos e inciertos, ofrece una vía útil para reconstruir la diversidad, equidad e inclusión (DEI) global con la equidad racial como eje central (Heifetz et al., 2009). A partir de perspectivas basadas en la práctica en salud global, sistemas laborales humanitarios, modelos de participación global de instituciones históricamente afroamericanas (HBCU, por sus siglas en inglés) y estructuras de recursos humanos en la educación superior, el estudio examina cómo los legados coloniales, las jerarquías raciales, los contextos políticos anti-DEI y las tensiones generacionales configuran la inclusión en asociaciones académicas internacionales. Mediante una síntesis cualitativa de documentos organizacionales, modelos de DEI y reflexiones de profesionales, este ensayo presenta un marco adaptativo de tres componentes que incluye: el diagnóstico de inequidades arraigadas en sistemas educativos coloniales, la movilización de comunidades a través de la narración y el diálogo intergeneracional, y la institucionalización de la equidad racial mediante auditorías de equidad, autoría compartida y el reconocimiento de tradiciones intelectuales no occidentales. El artículo subraya la urgencia de este trabajo, particularmente en un contexto donde las políticas anti-DEI en Estados Unidos influyen en las colaboraciones internacionales y plantean interrogantes sobre los valores que orientan las alianzas académicas. El objetivo es trascender la inclusión simbólica y apoyar a las instituciones en la reimaginación de la DEI global mediante prácticas basadas en la justicia, la reciprocidad y la equidad.
Recommended Citation
Edwards, Briana C.
(2026)
"Reimagining Global DEI through Adaptive Leadership: A Framework for Advancing Racial Equity in International Higher Education Partnerships,"
Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education: Vol. 18:
No.
4, Article 18.
DOI: 10.64899/2151-0407.2048
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/jcihe/vol18/iss4/18
References
References
Ahmed, S. (2012). On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life. Duke University Press.
Andreotti, V., Stein, S., Pashby, K., & Nicolson, M. (2015). Social cartographies as performative devices in research on higher education internationalization. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1125854
Arroyo, A. T., & Gasman, M. (2014). An HBCU-based educational approach for Black college student success: Toward a framework with implications for all institutions. American Journal of Education, 121(1), 57–85. https://doi.org/10.1086/678112
Bensimon, E. M. (2007). The underestimated significance of practitioner knowledge in the scholarship on student success. The Review of Higher Education, 30(4), 441–469. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2007.0032
Bhambra, G. K. (2014). Connected sociologies. Bloomsbury Academic.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business ethics: Managing citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
de Wit, H., & Hunter, F. (2015). The future of internationalization of higher education in Europe. International Higher Education, 83, 2–3. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2015.83.9073
DiAngelo, R. (2018). White fragility: Why it’s so hard for White people to talk about racism. Beacon Press.
Enslin, P., & Horsthemke, K. (2004). Can Ubuntu provide a model for citizenship education in African democracies? Comparative Education, 40(4), 545–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305006042000284538
Gaillard, J. C. (2019). Disaster studies inside out. Disasters, 43(Suppl. 1), S7–S17. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12323
Glass, C. R., Westmont, C. M., & colleagues. (2019). Comparative effects of belongingness on the academic success and cross-cultural interactions of domestic and international students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 38, 106–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.04.004
Heifetz, R., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2009). The practice of adaptive leadership: Tools and tactics for changing your organization and the world. Harvard Business Press.
Heleta, S., & Chasi, S. (2023). Curriculum decolonization and internationalization: A critical perspective from South Africa. Journal of International Students, 14(2), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v14i2.6383
Jones, S., Niesche, R., & Zahavi, H. (2023). Global perspectives on equity in higher education under anti-DEI policies. Comparative Education Review, 67(4), 555–573. https://doi.org/10.1086/725434
Knight, J. (2013). The changing landscape of higher education internationalisation—For better or worse? Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 17(3), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2012.753957
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465
Lee, J. J., & Rice, C. (2007). Welcome to America? International student perceptions of discrimination. Higher Education, 53(3), 381–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-005-4508-3
Marginson, S. (2016). The worldwide trend to high participation higher education: Dynamics of social stratification in inclusive systems. Higher Education, 72, 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0016-x
National Science Foundation. (2021). Higher education research and development (HERD) survey. https://ncses.nsf.gov/surveys/higher-education-research-development/2021
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2020). Decolonization, development and knowledge in Africa: Turning over a new leaf. Routledge.
Ospina, S., & Foldy, E. (2009). A critical review of race and leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(6), 876–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.09.005
R’boul, H. (2022). English medium instruction in Moroccan universities: Implications for multilingualism, linguistic dependency and epistemic justice. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 43(10), 2770–2784. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2069250
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2008). The Sage handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed.). Sage.
Robinson, L., Chen, W., Schulz, J., & Khilnani, A. (2018). Digital inequality across major life realms. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(9), 1159–1166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218773800
Shahjahan, R. A., & Edwards, K. (2022). Whiteness as futurity and globalization of higher education. Higher Education, 83(4), 747–764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00702-x
Stein, S. (2020). A colonial history of the higher education present. Critical Studies in Education, 61(2), 212–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2017.1409646
Stein, S. (2021a). Internationalizing the curriculum. In J. J. Lee (Ed.), U.S. power in international higher education (pp. 187–204). Rutgers University Press.
Stein, S. (2021b). Critical internationalization studies at an impasse: making space for complexity, uncertainty, and complicity in a time of global challenges. Studies in Higher Education, 46(9), 1771–1784. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1704722
Stein, S., & Andreotti, V. (2017). Higher education and the modern/colonial global imaginary. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 17(3), 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708616672673
Uzhegova, D., & Baik, C. (2022). Internationalisation of higher education in an uneven world. Studies in Higher Education, 47(4), 847–859. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1811220
Van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Polity.
Wagstaff, A. E., & Gasman, M. (2015). Fostering international student success at HBCUs. Journal of Studies in International Education, 19(2), 1–18.
Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press.
Yao, C. W., Briscoe, K. L., & Rutt, J. N. (2021). In the aftermath of a racialized incident. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 14(3), 386–397. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000179
Included in
Adult and Continuing Education Administration Commons, Higher Education Commons, International and Comparative Education Commons, Leadership Studies Commons, Other Educational Administration and Supervision Commons, Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons

