Document Type
Article
Abstract
Bayesian phylogenetic analyses are now very popular in systematics and molecular evolution because they allow the use of much more realistic models than currently possible with maximum likelihood methods. There are, however, a growing number of examples in which large Bayesian posterior clade probabilities are associated with very short edge lengths and low values for non-Bayesian measures of support such as nonparametric bootstrapping. For the four-taxon case when the true tree is the star phylogeny, Bayesian analyses become increasingly unpredictable in their preference for one of the three possible resolved tree topologies as data set size increases. This leads to the prediction that hard (or near-hard) polytomies in nature will cause unpredictable behavior in Bayesian analyses, with arbitrary resolutions of the polytomy receiving very high posterior probabilities in some cases. We present a simple solution to this problem involving a reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm that allows exploration of all of tree space, including unresolved tree topologies with one or more polytomies. The reversible-jump MCMC approach allows prior distributions to place some weight on less-resolved tree topologies, which eliminates misleadingly high posteriors associated with arbitrary resolutions of hard polytomies. Fortunately, assigning some prior probability to polytomous tree topologies does not appear to come with a significant cost in terms of the ability to assess the level of support for edges that do exist in the true tree. Methods are discussed for applying arbitrary prior distributions to tree topologies of varying resolution, and an empirical example showing evidence of polytomies is analyzed and discussed.
Recommended Citation
Lewis, Paul O.; Holder, Mark T.; and Holsinger, Kent E., "Polytomies and bayesian phylogenetic inference" (2005). EEB Articles. 12.
https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/eeb_articles/12
Comments
Reprinted from Systematic Biology, Vol. 54, Issue 2, April 2005, pp. 241-253 The published version is available at: http://taylorandfrancis.metapress.com/(d1i2ixiw4fxwnk45sdx43ame)/app/home/contribution.asp?referrer=parent&backto=issue,5,13;journal,10,47;linkingpublicationresults,1:102493,1