Date of Completion
7-30-2013
Embargo Period
1-26-2014
Keywords
MM-estimation Winsorization Truncation Robust estimator outliers
Major Advisor
Gim Seow
Associate Advisor
Yonghong An
Associate Advisor
Amy Dunbar
Field of Study
Business Administration
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Open Access
Campus Access
Abstract
Outliers can lead to incorrect inferences in least squares regression. In this study, I evaluate outlier treatment methods: MM-estimation as named in Yohai (1987), winsorization, and truncation, providing more evidence for outlier treatment in accounting research. Simulation results where I seed known “outliers” suggest that MM-estimation has the best performance. In particular, in the presence of the most influential type of outliers, theory-based MM-estimation provides inferences similar to the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator, i.e. the best linear unbiased estimator, whereas winsorization and truncation fail to provide right inferences over 99 percent of the time. I also show that MM-estimation provides the most accurate predicted earnings and estimated discretionary accruals: with truncation creating more bias and inference problems than not treating the outliers, the means (medians) of the absolute earnings prediction errors and discretionary accruals using winsorization are higher than those using MM-estimation by more than 21% (48%) on average. In sum, MM-estimation provides more reliable results, which should be an important consideration for future accounting research employing datasets containing outliers.
Recommended Citation
Qu, Li, "An Evaluation of Outlier Treatment Methods in Accounting Research" (2013). Doctoral Dissertations. 159.
https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/dissertations/159