In this Essay, I respond briefly to 18 articles contributed to this special Festschrift issue of the Connecticut Law Review. All but one of the contributions fall within two categories: constitutional change and constitutional interpretation. These topics have engaged me for most of my career as a legal scholar. While every one of the contributions sheds new and useful light on these subjects, I usually have some differences with the interpretations argued in them. Of course, I can only treat those differences superficially here. In each case, moreover, my comments should not obscure my sincere admiration of and appreciation for the authors’ efforts.
Kay, Richard, "Response to the Contributors" (2021). Connecticut Law Review. 484.